


The billing processes seemed good. Client portal seems interesting, but limiting value. Had discussion with others and reflected that I think the presentation was weaker, but not necessarily the product – Laura GurrI liked the hyperlinks as it makes getting to things faster and easier - Penny PeppasThis software seemed to put the information at your "fingertips". It had lots of functionality and compared to Aderant seemed to be a more end to end solution for practice management. - Spencer Farias

It seems very simple to use. Lots of features. It's not missing much. The scratch pad would be a direct replacement for my outlook tasks. – Matt Rynenintegration with their own document filing; calendar shows whatever I enter in outlook and in actionstep. – Penny PeppasCloud based. Interface is reasonably clean. - Will ChurchI really liked the flow chart at the top of the page. – Laura GurrI have a clear preference for this package over CosmoLex. Clean interface, looks like lots of data at the lawyers' fingertips. Ability to have multiple timers and then later assign to a matter rather than at the outset is useful. Client/contact relationship view is helpful especially for my practice. Workflows for files to show the stages of the matter. Ability to determine how long a file has sat in a certain stage could be useful. – Josh LaplanteThis was my second favourite software - next to Clio. It seemed well thought out and offered a full suite of functionality. Its case management tools were likely the best of all four software demos. The presentation seemed organized, and the company established. I believe this would be a good fit for CH - but I would like to see more. – Spencer Farias


Amount of data at fingertips. Queries seemed effective. Ability to flag files (overdue AR, payment schedule, etc.) Timekeeper + AI monitoring looks great. Lawyer direct input on prebills/writedowns/etc.
Integrated expensing system. – Josh Laplantevery user friendly; love the hyperlinks so that information is literally at your fingertips and it doesn't take 10 clicks to get what you want. – Penny PeppasI liked the customization of the tiles. It would replace Termi, ProLaw and the automation of dockets could be a huge time saver (and capture more billable time). Client intake and onboarding is a very nice feature – Laura GurriTimekeep seems to be slick as a standalone product. – Matt RynenThe software featured a very minimalist approach - less clicks the better. This seemed to make it highly functional. Overall, it seemed very responsive and easy to use for billings and docketing. The AI features seemed well integrated and handy. - Spencer Farias







Seems easy to navigate. Flexible to edit -- would want some security or controls or audit log of changes.
I really like Rob and Calvin - knowledgeable about law, no salesy pitch - talking facts. – Janice DeThomasisThis one seemed to be the most full-featured of all the products. They had a good answer for every question we had. AI integration was slick, and it will learn from our inputs over time. – Matt RynenThe interface is smooth and intuitive. The docketing is easy and functional – Laura GurrThe UI, the combination of many useful features such as budgeting, time tracking, file management etc all in one tool.
– David ZhjangOf the software packages reviewed Clio seemed to be the most "polished". While I found many of the alternatives to either be lacking in functionality or UI, Clio seemed to bridge this gap the best. It is a well-established vendor, with end-to-end functionality which will aid in collaboration - client interactions - and upkeep of files. – Spencer Farias
